Bob Dwyer Rugby Workshops

Dwyer's View

Super Rugby for Weekend 11-13th May, 2012

Aussie Teams Shine At Last!

 
On Saturday night, I had decided on my “headline” for this week’s article – “The Rebels are the Real Deal” – and then, on Sunday, came the Reds astonishing rout of the high-flying Chiefs. New headline needed!

Just a few weeks back I was bemoaning the form of most of the Aussie teams – the Brumbies being the exception – and now we have victories over the two in-form teams of NZ rugby; the Rebels astonishing and well-deserved win over the Crusaders and the Reds “back from the edge of the grave” to register the first Chiefs’ defeat since Round 1.

Despite the Rebels’ five-try, two bonus point defeat to the Bulls – no mean feat – just one week ago, I was fearing a bloodbath at the hands of the in-form Crusaders. How wrong could I have been? 18 months ago, I acknowledged my support for Rebels’ head coach, Damien Hill, based on the quality technique displayed by his Sydney Uni teams – this quality under pressure of game situations has always been, for me, the sign of a quality coach. Recently though, I had begun to question my assessment, especially given the distinct lack of technique in the support lines of the Rebels fowards and Nick Phipps’ consistent slow and inaccurate passing. Lo and behold, what a turn-around! Five tries against the Bulls in a quality display full of character was followed, one week later, by a deserved win against the all-time Super Rugby champs, the Crusaders. During the game, at different points, I made the following notes:

• Kurtley Beale is a genius.

• Peyper is a joke; Crockett is the problem.

• Crusaders’ forwards consistently take the space in front of the ball at the tackle.

• Gerrard’s kicking makes him man-of-the match.

• Rebels support lines to the tackled player/s allowed for early pass or off-load to keep pressure on the Crusaders’ defence.

• Rebels in for the kill – a sure sign of a hungry team.

• Impressed by Robinson, Pyle, Neville, Delve, Phipps, Beale, Vuna, Gerrard. (The whole team actually played well, but I especially noted these.)

The Rebels now look “the real deal” and can go forward from here. As I said to one of their senior members during last week, they “seem to have played with more character!”

The Reds had improved the previous weekend against the Crusaders – perhaps not as good as the Reds’ one-man cheer-squad of Greg Martin would have us believe, but improving. [Incidentally, Greg described the Reds four point loss to the Crusaders as “full of merit”, but referred to the Waratahs being “overwhelmed” by the same Crusaders, by the same four-point margin!] This week, v the table-topping Chiefs, at the 36 minute mark, the Reds were shot. The score was 8-22 and the Reds could not get any controlled scrum ball at all. Then a determined try to Ben Lucas, right on the stroke of half-time, gave them a glimmer of hope. The half-time break showed, yet again, how tactically astute Ewen McKenzie is. Scrums seemed to virtually disappear from the game – you statisticians can give us the accurate numbers – pick and go was now the order of the day and when the ball did shift wider, continuous play was achieved via tight support lines. Will Genia, apparently free from the pressures of “contract negotiations”, played last week with tons of commitment and spirit.
This week, he added quality to all he did. This has been a transformation and he gave his team the momentum and, indeed, the life-line. They all responded and there was virtually nothing the Chiefs could do to stem the Red tide. Liam Gill has risen along with Genia – albeit from a different level – and was a significant contributor to the outcome. Greg Martin had correctly predicted an intriguing battle between the scavenging of Gill and the running skills of the Chiefs’ backrow. The late, great Dave Brockhoff was often wont to say, “You can’t get Utopia in the backrow”, but the Chiefs’ selectors will try harder next time to get closer to Utopia. The Reds have genuine pace – how did Genia skin Masaga? – across the pitch and they executed a lot more accurately, although still more improvement is needed. I was impressed with Simmons again, Gill, Genia, Lucas, Ioane and Shipperly. Horwill did excellently at the lineout and restarts, but I still want more from him in the “tight-loose”, and Wallace-Harrison and Robinson made great contributions as “Link’s finishers”. Morahan – and perhaps his team – will be extremely grateful that the referee’s assistant was conveniently wearing a blindfold and was “unable to get a number”, enabling him to escape a potentially damaging yellow card for a lift tackle. We may yet hear more about this. This was a significant and season-changing victory for the Reds.

The Waratahs, as they did against the Crusaders, continue to show more in some aspects of their game, only to be sadly let down in others. They definitely lifted their numbers and leg-drive at the tackle – some of the time – but their inconsistency let them down. For example, in the 31st minute, Rocky Elsom took advantage of quickly recycled ball, to charge through the heart of the Bulls defence, but subsequent lack of quick support at his tackle allowed the Bulls to immediately snuff out any threat. With the notable exception of Rob Horne’s break for an excellent early try, the Tahs attack was totally fundamental, asking no questions at all of the defence. Why didn’t they try the same again; the play must have 3 or 4 options? On the plus side, the Waratahs scrum was dominant – when have we been able to claim any sort of dominance in the scrum? – although this was not acknowledged by referee Pollock, when he doled out the scrum penalties. At the tackle also, I would question Pollock and two – against Elsom in the first half and Timani in the second – should have gone the other way, to my mind.

In the end, it was the Bulls superior ability to close out the game that won them the day. Skipper, Rocky Elsom, commented that it was “their ability to control field position at the end of the game” that spelled the difference. Indeed, in this period, the Bulls never looked like losing. From the 75th minute, the Waratahs conceded two lineouts and a 5 metre scrum turn around, when Lopeti Timani inexplicably tried to go the long way around a wheeled scrum How? Why?

In some ways, the Waratahs may have been the better team, but lost – again! They continue to be badly let down by dreadfully inaccurate passing, their kicking game is totally inadequate and their numbers at the tackle still inconsistent. Berrick Barnes is as big a culprit as anyone in the first two of these. I want the concept of forwards “reloading” at the tackle to be removed from the vocabulary of Aussie players. Then we might be capable of pressuring defences and make space for our talented backs. Kepu was great on the tight-head; he could yet be a star. AAC was good as ever. Elsom and Ulugia made significant contributions and both scrum-halves likewise.

The Force were dreadful. They looked tired and lethargic. Mark Lawrence was equally off the pace. I was delighted when the siren sounded.

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

Super Rugby - Weekend, 4-6 May, 2012.

Only one Aussie team won on the weekend and they defeated another Aussie team. The Rebels lost narrowly to the Bulls but picked up two bonus points; the Force lost by four points to the Cheetahs in Bloemfontein – not that easy a result; the Tahs were well beaten by the conference leaders, the Brumbies; and the Reds lost, but picked up a losing bonus point to the in-form Crusaders in Christchurch. In total, not a great weekend for the Aussies on the score-board, but, for my money, some consolation from improved performances.

The Rebels showed that there is a better life after Cipriani with Kurtley Beale leading his team in the most positive of displays. Stirling Mortlock made his long awaited return off the bench and his presence was both effective and inspirational. Cooper Vuna made a welcome return to form and Luke Jones was most effective on the side of the scrum – this may be a better position for him over the next year or two. He shows great promise. On the downside, Nick Phipps was poor. Accuracy in the pass is an essential quality for a scrum-half and, unfortunately, he was both slow and inaccurate. Richard Kingi needs work – over to the coaches – but could be a match winner at #9. Four tries plus the losing bonus point, from the lowest ranked Aussie team, against the Bulls is not to be sneezed at. Add James O’Connor to the backs, plus the return of a genuine fetcher in the forwards, and this is not looking too bad.

The Cheetahs have been in excellent form and the Force ran them close. Not bad either – but even better when you think that they could very easily have won. Their captain, David Pocock, does not much wrong on the rugby pitch, but his decision not to kick for goal from dead in front of the posts, when trailing by only four points and nearly 20 mins left on the clock, was a howler. They could easily have won! I thought that Nick Cummins and Nathan Charles both enhanced their growing reputations.

Our one winner, the Brumbies, were much the better team in their home game against the Waratahs. The game is, broadly speaking, about getting into position with urgency and executing accurately. The Brumbies did and the Waratahs didn’t. Full marks to the Tahs for their intent – they started with ambition and commitment – but very low marks for execution. I made at note a half-time that “the Tahs had been the better team”, but they trailed 13-6 at the break, courtesy of an excellent effort by the impressive Henry Speight. This should always be a warning sign; if you’ve fired lots of shots but not hit too many targets. And so it was – once again the Waratahs began to dawdle and positional urgency fell out the window. In the 62nd, 65th and 68th minutes, they conceded three consecutive penalties because they had NO SUPPORT for the ball-carrier at the tackle. 
Many will say that the Tahs made themselves numerous chances “but just couldn’t finish off”. My summary was – woeful accuracy in passing, no urgency in realignment, total lack of understanding off support play. All of these can be readily addressed at practice. For the winners, the rising reputations of Palmer, Fardy, Hooper, Mowen, Auelua, White, Lealiifano and Tomane were further enhanced. To them you can add, Sam Carter, Andrew Smith and Henry Speight. Mogg had a quiet game, with the Waratahs offering him no counter-attacking opportunities - but he did nothing wrong. The serious injury to Christian Lealiifano is gut- wrenching for all Aussie rugby supporters. He must have been seriously in line for the starting fly-half spot against the Scots next month and we are all with him in his disappointment. But, “when the going gets tough, .....”.

The Reds played much better. They had a shape to their game that I like. Their forwards were in behind the ball-carrier and kept pressure on the Crusaders defence – their stats showed 30 pick-and-goes! In the new-found tightness of the pack, Horwill and Higginbotham both now made significant contributions. Justin Marshall commented on the fact that the Reds were able to consistently make space out wide and this concentration of forward power with quick recycle was just how they did it. Unfortunately their scrum struggled – although Albert Anae looked very strong and promising, off the bench – and this cost them dearly, with the lottery of referees’ decisions at this phase. If the Reds could ever play with Slipper on the loose-head side, they could have an excellent scrum – perhaps Anae will give them that opportunity. It’s hard to win in Christchurch with a 17 -7 penalty count against, but with a number of their quality players back at last, they are looking good again. Digby Ioane made a massive difference and, of the “lesser lights”, Gill, Anae, Lucas and Shipperly all played well. Rob Simmons continues to rise in my estimation . He could develop into an important lock for the Wallabies for many years. The Reds looked much better to me.

Disappointed as I was with the Waratahs, I’m feeling a little more optimistic for the Wallabies.

www.bobdwyerrugby.com.

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK. 
 

Super Rugby 2012. Weekend 27-29th April, 2012.

Last weekend, I challenged you all to name your ”alternate Wallaby XV” to be coached by me to challenge the Wallabies in a “Wallaby trial match”. So, it’s about time I picked my team.

One of you suggested that Jake White should coach the team – given the success and style of this year’s Brumbies – and I agreed. However, having subsequently discussed the fantasy proposition with a friend – an ex-coach and player at international level – he responded with a “we’re calling time on the non-Aussie coaches, ok!”

So I’m coach again, but I’m bringing in the Brumbies back-up team of Laurie Fisher and Steve Larkham. We don’t want to lose all of the benefits that the Brumbies have gained, do we? Anyway, there’ll be a pile of Brumbies in the team, so we might as well maintain the consistency.

Here goes:

L/H Prop. James SLIPPER.
He’s a great scummager on the l/h side and he can maintain his fantastic workrate better, without the added workload of the t/h side. I like Cowan and Daley too, but Slipper is bigger and stronger.


Hooker. Tatafu POLOTA-NAU.
Best scrummaging hooker of the lot and fantastic around the pitch. Will suit my game.


T/H Prop. Sekope KEPU.
Needs to continue to improve his scrummaging, which he is doing under Michael Foley, but he is a freak athlete. When he reaches his peak, he will be a world-beater. Palmer is also very good and probably a the best technical t/head scrummager.


Locks. Hugh PYLE & Scott FARDY.
Pyle is the athlete – I’ll make sure that he does his share of the hard stuff, also – and Fardy is, in the words of the SA commentator, “a 100 per center”. I thought of David Dennis here also, but I like Fardy’s consistent nose to the grindstone approach.


No.6. Rocky ELSOM. Captain.
I’m assuming that Rocky will continue to play and settle in, in which case he is an obvious selection for me. I like Dennis and Mowen also.


N0.7. Michael HOOPER.
He has pretty much everything. If he was as big as his dad, he’d be a World XV selection.


N0.8. Fotu AUELUA.
Reminds me a bit of Willie OFAHANGUE – he has the mentality to back up his physical qualities. Say no more. Someone queried his qualification; he was an Australian Schoolboy, from Trinity College in Sydney, back in 2001. There are others around – e.g. Mowen, Vaea – but Fotu could be special.


Scrum-half. Nic WHITE.
No problem for the selectors; just had to write down his name. A fair dinkum scrum-half who knows his trade.


Fly-half. Christian LEALIIFANO.
Likewise no problem here either. A fly-half who runs straight; what next?


In-center. Ben TAPUAI.
Looks the goods. Carter and Harris are both worth a look also. All are tough and hard-nosed. Harris carries for more hard yards for his team than Higginbotham.


Out-centre.
Nick CUMMINS. I’m not entirely convinced. His recent form has not been quite as convincing as his earlier season, but is big enough and quick and agile. I’ll back him! Not many others with Horne way off the pace.


Wings. Tom KINGSTON & Joe TOMANE.
Great pace, great footwork and not afraid to have a go. Both are strong and tough and skillful. Tomane also could be special. There are others worthy of selection - Speight, Shipperley (defence is a question).


Fullback. Jesse MOGG.
Foley looks good also and Gerrard is a rock for the Rebels, but Mogg “wants to play”.


So the team is:

SLIPPER, POLOTA-NAU, KEPU, PYLE, FARDY, ELSOM (C), HOOPER, AUELUA, WHITE, LEALIIFANO, TOMANE, TAPUAI, CUMMINS, KINGSTON, MOGG.

Coach. DWYER.


Ass’t Coaches. FISHER & LARKHAM.


Bring it on!


So much for our alternative xv. I really wanted to talk about the Brumbies and the foundations of their consistent, high quality performances, which are attractive and exciting for fans – and, no doubt, also for their players.


A statement I make often is, “You don’t need great players, you need players playing great.” Great players are those generally considered great by the informed media, by the fans and, probably, by coaches and selectors. At the beginning of this season, none of these players would have been considered great by any but a biased few – Mogg, Tomane, Speight, Smith, Lealiifano, White, Auelua, Hooper, Fardy, (Sam) Carter, Kuridrani, Power, and more. Yet you see seven of these relative unknowns selected in my unofficial Wallabies “second xv”. Many of you also selected all or most. How has this happened?
 

Joel Stransky, summing up his commentary after the game, said simply, “They moved the ball flat and ran hard.” He might also have added, that:

They lined not too far apart – this makes for quicker, more accurate passing and easier support,

They lined flat – this assists straight running,

Their support players from 1 to 10, plus the blindside wing, chase the ball,

Their ball-carrier expects support from in behind, and uses it with an offload or immediate recycle,

Their backs realign with urgency and thereby take advantage of opportunities presented,

They have a scrum-half who chases the ball and clears it without any lift, skip=step or back-swing – hallelujah!

Their fly-half stays close to his scrum-half and attacks the line – be it for one pace or ten,

• They concentrate on leg-drive at the tackle, not “clearing out”, etc, etc.

I could go on and you’ve heard most of this from me before, but the application of these simple fundamentals – and they really are simple – gives players an opportunity to play. Some months back, the principles of a team in which I have a small interest, asked me if I would look over their team and advise who, in my opinion, were “good players”. I replied that I could not do that, “because”, I said, “you don’t play any rugby!” I meant any quality rugby, of course, and, in the Brumbies case, they are consistently playing quality rugby and we can now clearly see who “the good players are.” Now, if our national coaching staff can likewise insist on the quality execution of quality technique in the fundamentals which underpin performance, we will see lots of very good players. Oh and I forgot to repeat, “They are all simple.”

Richie McCaw, when interviewed after their win over the Waratahs, explained their much improved second-half display by referring to their half-time commitment to “getting the basics better.” It was ever thus!

The Waratahs played much better. Urgency of support to the ball-carrier, with good leg-drive on arrival, was a few steps up – not great, but much improved. Their first try was scored simply because support was immediately available – Dennis off-load to Douglas, Douglas off-load to McKibbin, instead of the mind-numbing, pathetically slow, ruck ball, which has become the world norm. Ball primarily in hand, players back behind the ball-carrier with urgency – at times – gave results. There is some hope for the future.

I thought that it was great to see Richie back, until, immediately, he attempted to bully the assistant ref, Craig Joubert, then mutter and shake his head in disbelief, that Jonathan Kaplan could dare to penalise him for the most blatantly obvious off-side. His attitude, even arrogance, detracts from a truly great player.

The Reds were average against a dreadful Blues side, but Will Genia was fantastic in his contribution to their victory. His non-stop play, particularly in cover, saved the day, time and again. How sickeningly disappointing then to hear the vitriol being poured on him today, from his supposed supporters, for his ‘traitorous decision’ to sign with the Western Force. He wasn’t a Queenslander in the first place, anyway, and you were all priviledged to have him – or his parents -choose your team in the first place. Maybe this very (lack of) character around him was a factor in his decision to go!

www.bobdwyerrugby.com.

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING WEBSITE.

Super Rugby 20th-21st April 2012

Super Rugby 20th-21st April 2012.

 
By Bob Dwyer.
 
22nd April, 2012.
 

 

This was always going to be a very important week for the Aussie Super Rugby teams, with the Reds against the in-form Stormers, the Brumbies away in Pretoria to the Bulls and the derby between the Waratahs and the Force. All were important matches for different reasons and I, for one, got a lot from them.

The Reds were severely disrupted by early injuries to two mid-fielders, Lane and Tapuai - and for a short while played Radike Samo in the centres – but still battled gamely against the odds to stay in touch on the scoreboard. The Reds have never been short on courage and this was yet another example, but I’m still concerned with the lack of form of some of their name players. I continue to believe that neither Higginbotham nor Horwill contribute enough in the tight stuff, especially in attack. Maybe Ewen McKenzie’s decisions to sub both of them also indicate his concerns. Genia’s passing is not good enough – he lifts the ball, winds up with a backswing and takes a skip step before releasing, far too often. This has very little to do with what’s happening in front of him; it’s simply poor technique. On the plus side, the frontrow and Beau Robinson and definitely contributing. Rob Simmons is having more impact in his ball carries and his defensive hits – maybe a sign of his young body maturing. He’s still got a way to go, but he’s heading in the right direction.

The Brumbies gave some answers to the questions of – I’m sure – all of us, and they stood up and “had a go”. Technique under pressure was sound and execution of the fundamentals – catch and pass, straight running,realignment, ball in front, numbers and leg drive at the tackle, speed off the line in defence – was good. Well done, coaching staff. They had real courage and determination – the qualities of winners! Their frontrow was also good and Fardy, Hooper, Mowen and Auelua all advanced their standing. I had wanted to see how they went against the “big boys”. Now I’ve seen them and they passed the examination. If they can do as well against the Stormers and the Crusaders, they should all get a call to the next level. Nick White was excellent – fancy having a #9 who is always at the tackle and shifts the ball – either via the pass or the snipe – without delay! What a revelation! He is clearly the next best after Genia – who, what’s more, should have a good look over his shoulder. Even McCabe is looking more complete and is gradually adding other qualities to his undoubted courage. I would not be forgetting Lealiifano, Speight, Tomane and Mogg either, if I were a selector. Carter has qualities also, to add to his 2m height – he has skill and courage and excellent genes – but it’s too soon for him just yet.

The Waratahs continue to “flatter to deceive”. They looked fantastic at the start, with speed and numbers to the tackle, good body position and leg drive, no delay in the recycle. McKibbin was looking very good; Carter continued his (surprising) good lines, etc; then it all slowed down horribly. At the 21st minute, I wrote myself a note (for the Tahs), “Keep up the pace of the game”. I should have shouted the message, because they didn’t heed my note. “13 points in 13 minutes, that’s obviously enough, let’s switch off!” A stupid, lazy penalty from Dean Mumm and soon after a try to the Rebels. They aren’t great, the Rebels, but all teams are worthy of their opponents’ respect, and for the Waratahs to expect to win without trying is disrespectful! No good! Then we had the weekly switch-off by the Tahs around the 50 – 70 min mark, this time after the soft try to TPN – well taken though it was! Then, following Horne’s try, they knocked on from the restart and gave away two successive penalties – try to Rebels! Our subsequent restart was short, then three successive penalties, Horne back on, more penalties, Beale great, another try! Meanwhile, Halangahu reminded us of his total disinterest in tackling.

I was heartened when I looked at the bench and saw Rocky Elsom, Sitaleki Timani and Sarel Pretorious sitting together – fair bit of ability there – but we must use our bench more effectively. Other positives came from Berrick Barnes’ kicking – he got excellent length to touch – and Elsom got a few minutes and looked confident. The Tahs should have been desperate for the bonus-point try; indeed, if they had secured it, they would now be top of the Aussie conference, but when they were awarded an easy penalty in the dying minutes, Alcock pointed at the posts. Then, McKibbin kicked aimlessly on turnover ball – again! What is going on inside some players’ heads? The Waratahs’ performances are nowhere near either the required standard or their potential.

Quite a few readers have speculated on Wallaby test selection and asked my opinion. Here’s an idea. I’ll choose the “obvious” XV – see below - based mainly on past selections and past performances – they do count, after all. Then you can all choose an alternative XV, with none of the “obvious” team included. I’ll join our alternate team selectors also and I’ll be happy to coach the alternative team – give me one week – and we’ll challenge the Wallabies. It’ll be like an old “All Black trial”.

Robinson, Moore, Alexander, Horwill (c), Simmons, Higginbotham, Palu, Pocock, Genia, Barnes, Ioane, McCabe, AAC, O’Connor, Beale.

P.S. The Crusaders played fantastically well against the previously in-form Hurricanes. They have added a new level of intensity and physicality to their play and have certainly thrown down the gauntlet to all other teams, but I saw something entirely new in this game. I saw a try awarded, to the Crusaders, after three successive, blatantly obvious forward passes! Could this be one for the Guinness Book of Records from a three-man team of adjudicators!;

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

Super Rugby - More of the same

Super Rugby - More of the same.

 
By Bob Dwyer.
 
15th April, 2012.
 

 

I hate to say it, but nothing much has changed in the total picture following this weekend’s Super Rugby matches. New Zealand and South African teams are still playing at a level way above our Aussie teams. If anything, South African teams remain the big improvers, with the Bulls and the Stormers – despite their Chris Pollock-influenced loss to the Crusaders – likely to provide the bulk of a potentially very good Springbok team.

Of course, the Reds had the bye, and this takes a lot of quality Aussie players out of view, but there was a distinct lack of quality from our current top level players. The Rebels were just awful, the Force and the Waratahs average, at best, with the Brumbies way the best of a bad lot – although difficult to judge accurately against a woeful Rebels outfit. Our “star” players - Beale and O’Connor for perfect example - were a long way off the pace. Even David Pocock was clearly outpointed on the night by his Waratah opponent, the relatively unknown, at the highest level, Chris Alcock. There is virtually not a lock in the country who could give us an edge, on current form, against our SANZAR opponents. Sharpie has looked ok, but his honest workrate will not transfer into hard yards at the highest level. I saw great possibilities last season for Sitaleki Timani, but he can’t get a start with the Tahs. Rob Simmons has played better this season than I thought he could, but will still not be causing sleepless nights for his potential test-match opponents and I can’t see Horwill as the answer. He was a much better player a few years back when he first made the Wallabies. All of this – think about it – with three of the very best locks of recent seasons no longer on the scene. Matfield, Botha and Thorn are all gone and still we can’t hack it.

Maybe – I live in hope – we have some potential quality players emerging, but the quality of our play gives no scope for players to realise their potential. Last year, a coach (not Australian, I hasten to add) asked me if I would cast an eye over his team and tell him which of his players I rated. I replied that I would not be able to do that. “You don’t play any rugby,” I explained, “so it’s impossible for me to answer accurately. I can see some potential, with some skill, some athleticism, some height and weight, but I need to see them under pressure, in both attack and defence, before I can answer.”

The Brumbies are giving us some hope. Certainly, they are showing the other coaches, including the national coach, how to play the game and to maximise opportunities for players to realise their potential. I have said more than once that “you don’t need great players; you need players playing great”. This is what the Brumbies are doing; they’re playing some great rugby – technically accurate execution of some of the basics of the game. In the first half of their match, against the hapless Rebels, their execution of “continuous play” was inspiring. I say in my Coaching Manual that we must have “action without hesitation” at the tackle contest. “We must not have a stop-start attack.” I have talked, in the last few weeks, about accurate positional play in support. The support player must be positioned, in relation to the ball-carrier, so that he is capable of “accepting an off-load, a loop pass, or chasing a line-break.” This position is a conservative one and an easy one – really easy physically. It requires understanding and attention to the simple detail. “Arriving players”, I say, “must (a) arrive with good, low body-position, with heads up and hands out in front; (b) have the intention of attaching to the ball-carrier, lifting him to help him to stay on his feet and to continue the forward drive; (c) take an off-load, if given, or seal off the ball.” Attention to this easily achieved detail gave the Brumbies two tries – to Hooper and Fardy – and put Mowen in position for his try. And remember that most of these Brumby players have not been previously highly rated, but they are “playing great”.

On the other side of the pitch, with the Rebels, we saw some “great players” who played way, way “less than great”. Phipps was terrible – again – and Cipriani and O’Connor were so deep that their attack had absolutely no hope at all. Perhaps they didn’t relish the power in the Brumbies defence! With this in front of him, Beale had no chance, but he didn’t aid his cause with, for example, a stupid chip kick, running out of his defensive area early in the game. This led directly to McCabe’s try – which, incidentally, again showed up O’Connor’s defensive frailty in the inside centre spot. The less fashionable players, Gerrard, Delve and Jed Robinson (every week), and Johannsen and Huxley, when they came on, had a real go and looked immeasurably better. “You don’t need great players; you need players playing great.” Over to you coaches! Thankfully, there are some players coming through who may have the goods. Some whom we’ve seen before but I hadn’t rated highly at international level, who are now looking possible. I mentioned Simmons above and Brett Sheehan is another. Tapuai continues to give reason for hope, as does Beau Robinson. Hooper has plenty going for him and his backrow mate, Fotu Auelua, could be ok when he get’s fit (I don’t care how old he is, only that he has a go). Nick White looks very promising, another in a long line of outstanding scrum-halves from the Hunter Valley. I hope that this means that we have seen the last of Phipps in a Wallaby jersey. There are a few centres with a bit of size – at last – who deserve watching. Cummins, for sure, plus the Brumbies’ Tomane, Kuridrani and – I haven’t forgotten – Andrew Smith. Tom Kingston looks a real prospect with genuine speed and skill and still a few more kilos to gain.

Scott Fardy looks a genuine goer – not many cry babies play for the Dirty Rats – and Hugh Pyle, despite a very quiet game last weekend, is also a talent. If Sitaleki Timani can come up with last season’s form, he’s another – surely he’s worth a start for the Tahs.

There’s a lot of ‘maybes’ – I’m sure there’s even a few more – but we MUST have the basis of our current Wallabies team in form. Then we can bring others into the squad and drip-feed these new-comers gradually.

If only we can then play some rugby, we can then determine which of all of them, old and new, has the goods.;

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

Super Rugby, Just Super

Super Rugby, Just Super

 
By Bob Dwyer.
 
8th April, 2012.
 

 

A few weeks back, I said that New Zealand rugby was looking in great shape, with South Africa behind them and Aussie rugby trailing behind. On the evidence of this weekend, I’m thinking that South African rugby has caught up quite a bit – and, horror, they are playing real, old-Springbok, knock-‘em-down, throw-‘em-out, rugby. This is a tough and talented Highlanders outfit, but they were just bashed up and outplayed by the unbeaten Stormers. Add the Bulls, plus a few from the Sharks and elsewhere, and the Springboks will be quite a hurdle – for anyone!

The weekend featured some great play. Really “Super Rugby” – hard, tough and determined, fast and skilful. Problem was, not much came from Aussie teams, or even from Aussie players. The Bulls, Crusaders, Stormers, Hurricanes, some of the Chiefs play, were all great. We, unfortunately, were not so great.

On the Aussie front, I might as well get right to it. The Reds were much improved and Scott Higginbotham scored two tries – both, dare I say it, from excellent support play! I was critical last year, and again last week, of his (lack of) support play – and I stand by my comments. This week, against the Brumbies, he was perfectly positioned in support of the ball-carrier down the left touchline, both times taking the inside pass to score. In my Coaching Manual, describing accurate positional play, when supporting from inside to out, I say. “The position which you must strive to achieve, is about 2-3 metres inside the ball-carrier and about 3-4 metres behind the ball-carrier.” He was, especially for his second try, spot on! Physically, he’s got it all. Let’s hope he’s beginning the get the hang of the game, especially the backrow forward game. The Reds were much improved, but the Brumbies looked a little limited in their approach. When the Reds shut off their counter-attack, they didn’t seem to have anything from outside their predetermined structure. Sam Lane made a quality debut in a fly-half display which clearly indicated that he does understand his role. He’s got good genes and should go well in the future.

While the in-form Chiefs had to work hard in Perth for their victory over a determined Force, they (the Force) simply lack the firepower to go toe-to-toe with the top Super Rugby teams. To their great credit, they never stopped trying and went desperately close to scoring on a few occasions. David Pocock is heading back to top form and his two backrow mates were never far from the action either. The ageless Nathan Sharpe got through a ton of work, but I can’t help feeling that he should get out of the line of quick ball and let the more creative players have a go. Cummins, for example, could make good use of some of the ball that Sharpie “carts up into three tacklers and dies with.”

The Rebels can be happy with their new signings, Beale and O’Connor, and their “first year” foreign signings, Cipriani and Delve. The “fighter pilots” in the backline revealed some of their real talent – but there is a lot more to come – and Delve showed yet again, what a real “pro” should do, week in, week out. He’ll get the key to the City of Melbourne before he’s finished. The Rebels have blooded a few who will figure in Wallaby discussions before long – Pyle has size and athleticism and plays close to the ball, all of the time, and Saffy, despite some handling malfunctions, has genuine pace and a ton of determination. “New” defence coach, John Muggleton, also deserves a rap. The Rebels defence gave their opponents no room and no respite for the entire game and constantly worried them into error. Those opponents, the Auckland Blues, were dreadful. How a group with so much individual talent can produce such a load of rubbish, is a mystery. An investigation is warranted.

The Waratahs picked up four points for nothing, but have, over the preceding week, consistently moaned about “how they have been looking forward to the break.” I’m not so happy about that attitude at all. I want players who can’t wait to get out there and get amongst it. A few years back, Glen Ella was reminiscing with me about how much he had loved playing. “You know,” he confided, “if our team scored a great try and, for some reason, I wasn’t involved in the play – I might have been tackled to the ground, or something – I’d have a big dose of the sh..s for the entire week, until I could get back out there the next week.” That’s the sort of player that I want. I said it last week about the Reds; now it the ‘Tahs turn. They should stop feeling sorry for themselves, reflect on just how lucky they are, and get out there and get on with it.

With all that said, and if we go back to my first paragraph, the Wallabies would struggle, at the moment, to put out a team confident of matching up to either New Zealand or South Africa. New boys, Argentina, are never easy either – although I can never really assess their strength, so widespread are their players – and I certainly wouldn’t put my house on the Wallabies in those two matches. Before the Four Nations, we have a three-test series against Grand Slammers, Wales - in absolutely top form - and one test against Scotland, where we must, by necessity, field an A-team. I can’t even pick a competitive Wallabies team, let alone an A team.

It’s looking like a long, long winter! 

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

A Lesson in Reality

A Lesson In Reality

 
By Bob Dwyer.
 
2nd April, 2012.
 

Last week, I was happy enough to write that “there were some encouraging signs for most Aussie teams”. This week the results told a different story, and it was back to earth with a resounding thud. However, not all is lost, I reckon, because there were still some signs that the “Aussie game” is starting to heed some lessons – most of which, by the way, have long been obvious to most supporters, if I can judge by hundreds of comments from you guys, over that same period.

Let’s start with the Rebels and get it over and done with. They were smashed – no two ways about it – by the Highlanders, but horrendous refereeing by Marius Jonker gave them a big leg up. The Highlanders first try, with the Force leading 9 points to nil, came from an obvious forward pass. The Force were always “just hanging on” and this took some wind out of their sails. Another try later came from another forward pass, but, in truth, this would have only affected the margin. The Highlanders are a good side, but they play with total disregard for the laws of the game, particularly at the tackle. You need a firm ref if you’re playing them and Jonker was light years from that. He should be demoted!

Still, the Rebels continue to look better to me. The fundamentals of their game are better – full marks to their coach, Damian Hill – but they need a few more high quality players.

The Force also look much better. Their attack asks some questions – and would ask a few more if Stannard could run straighter at fly-half. Cummins adds pace and footwork at centre. They get more forwards to the tackle than last year and subsequently can recycle the ball more quickly. This gave opportunity to Sheehan – which he took – and to their hardworking pack. While the Force generally looked hungry – save for an early second-half period, when Mafu gave away a stupid, lazy penalty, leading to Van Humphries’ try – the Reds looked positively dreadful. I know that they, like most teams, have a lot of injuries, but they are still permitted to play quality fundamentals. Genia continues to be ponderously slow with his pass and he dawdles across the field with the ball in hand. Higgenbottham should hand back his pay packet, given the amount of hard work – always the requirement of a No.6 – that he avoids. Pretty much every wide play they execute comes from a (badly executed) second-line play. I don’t like them although they can, if excellently executed, be sometimes beneficial. There are much more effective plays, which will, unlike second-line plays, ask better questions of the defence – and this is THE fundamental requirement of a quality attack. The Reds should stop feeling sorry for themselves and get stuck in!

The Waratahs also are looking better, despite their loss to a very good Chiefs side. I see some signs of Alan Gaffney’s work coming into their game – for example, much better catch & pass and straighter running. Their support play is improving also and, especially in the first half, allowed for frequent off-loads and good quick recycled ball. Consistency needs to lift, but, if you’re going in the right direction, you’ve got some chance of reaching your destination. Barnes and Horne were way off the pace, but attention to detail will reap benefits – “Foley and Gaffney, front and centre!” Vickerman and Elsom would be useful, asap, but, in the meantime Sitaleki Timani could add some grunt. AAC remains one of Australia’s best players and Tom Kingston is worth keeping in mind. The Waratahs supporters will reappear “out of the woodwork” if the team continues in this same direction.


The Chiefs had more firepower. From Barlow at scrum-half, through Cruden, SBW, Kahui, Nanai-Williams, Robinson they are all real threats to any defence. Add a genuine, hard-working forward pack and you’ve got a good side.

The Brumbies continue to impress. They allowed the Sharks to score a couple of runaway tries against the run of play – full marks to the Sharks – when better attention to detail, in terms of urgency and accuracy in support, would have prevented this. I mentioned Ben Mowen and Michael Hooper last week. You can add Jesse Mogg, who has talent, pace and ticker “to have a go.” Andrew Smith may have found a home at outside-centre. He is ex-Waratahs Academy and Australia Under-21, but has floundered for a while. He has pace and, importantly, size – something clearly lacking in the Wallabies mid-field.


Not the greatest weekend for Aussie teams, but, for my money, some clear reasons for optimism.


P.S. The Stormers –Bulls game in Cape Town was a cracker. No absence of commitment here!

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

Wales Rule in Fantastic Six Nations Championship

Wales Rule in Fantastic Six Nations Championship.

By Bob Dwyer.
 
18th March, 2012.
 

Since time began, or so it seems, our northern hemisphere cousins have been extolling the qualities of the Six Nations tournament – even when it was the Four Nations, and then the Five Nations. No matter how the number of competing nations has grown, they remain correct. It is a great tournament - and this year it was superb.

  The venues, the crowds, the passion and excitement, the sheer quality of the play – all were there for all to see. I loved it. Thanks to the worldwide television access, we can watch the games pretty much anywhere – well almost anywhere, I missed the England v France game whilst in Thailand conducting coaching camps and workshops for the Asia Centre Foundation, which cares for young, generally orphaned, victims of the horrendous tsunami a couple of years back.

   Anyway, I certainly saw all of this weekend’s matches and they were great. The key match, of course, was Wales v France in Cardiff at the Millenium Stadium. Wales were striving for the Championship and the Grand Slam, but France were there to upset them. Just a guess mind you, but I doubt that the Froggies would have been overjoyed to see Craig Joubert in charge, after the terrible deal he gave them in the RWC final last year. I certainly made a note of it – before the game began - on the top line of my jottings.

   If we are to believe the commentary teams – and I do – there were more disappointed fans outside the stadium than the lucky 75,000 crammed inside, when the match began, with the roof open, soon after a deluge had made conditions treacherous. The decision by France, to go for an “open roof’, gave the clue that France would adopt a pragmatic “put them under pressure and see how their skills hold up” approach and their selection of Beauxis, with his strong kicking game, confirmed this. In retrospect, they would have been better served with the more talented Trinh-Duc.

  The game was an absorbing talented contest, giving the lie to the wet, slippery conditions, with Wales keen to keep the ball in hand – either wide or through their running forwards – and France generally favouring the high ball through Beauxis. However, when the opportunity presented itself, the French could suddenly lift the pace and attack with precision. On two such occasions, one in the first half when a short lineout throw saw Servat free down the right touch and Wales under real pressure, then in the second half, Lydiate claimed Harinordiquy, when the try seemed certain. But these breakouts, although potentially lethal, were too few and too far between. Wales, on the other hand, consistently threatened, just as they have for the last twelve months, and their vision, intent and skill – not to mention size and pace – have bought them their just reward.

   It has occurred to me frequently in recent years, that perhaps the most important quality required of a top level coach, is his ability as a selector. Warren Gatland has introduced Warburton (youngest ever Six Nations captain), North, Cuthbert, Halfpenny (at fullback) – I could go on - after chopping and changing between lesser players for a couple of seasons. Likewise, Stuart Lancaster has been smart enough, and brave enough, to go for Farrell, Dickson, Morgan, Barritt, Botha – I could go on here also – after years of fiddling with captaincy and (again) lesser players, indeed some whose heads were considerably larger than their ability. Phillipe St. Andre, also, has stabilised the unbelievable merry-go-round of the French fifteen. It was only a year or so ago that France omitted Harinordoquy,  Rougerie and Bonnaire from the one selection, and Picamoles has only just reappeared following a phenomenal tour of New Zealand about two or three years back – not the easiest place to play rugby either! All three of these coaches have shown this quality and their teams have performed accordingly very well. It’s not the only quality required, but it’s a vital one.

    This match was indeed a fitting finale to a great championship. The defence from both teams was magnificent. France absorbed what appeared to be intolerable pressure in the opening quarter, to then bounce back and apply some of their own. The Welsh then took their turn to show just what they could do also. Both backrows were outstanding – Lydiate, Warburton and Faletau versus Dusautoir, Bonnaire and Harinordoquy. I’d walk over hot coals any day of the week to watch these trios in action again. (Whilst on the subject of defence, I thought that Fritz was great for France against the outstanding Roberts and Davies – more caps for him, please.)

   The better team won and, indeed, they were the best team in the tournament, but not by a lot. England ran them very close and were, in my opinion, a bit unlucky on that day. Wales played rugby the way we’ve always known that they, as a nation, could, but in recent years rarely have. This could be the beginning of another golden era for them – and for us, the spectators.

   I thought that the ref was very inconsistent. Sometimes – a couple with France hot on attack – it was a penalty for “not supporting your weight”, “going off your feet” at the tackle. Other times it was not. Trinh-Duc was penalised for throwing the ball away, whilst in touch, to prevent a quick Welsh throw-in. I see it happen every week, often worse than this and not penalised – even with this same ref. Brian Moore, commentating (intelligently) on the England v Ireland game, questioned the absence of a yellow card for Barritt for his deliberate playing of the ball, in an offside position, following a knock-on. How much more cynical, and damaging to France, was the same offence by Gethin Jenkins, with France storming on to the ball about 5 metres out from the try-line? But no yellow card here - Brian would have had apoplexy. Once again, I don’t think that the French would be happy with M. Joubert.

   I said two weeks ago that the New Zealand Super Rugby teams were playing well, South African teams ok and Australian teams poorly. Nothing has changed. Our rugby, in general, lacks pace, precision and intensity. We lack also the courage “to risk failure in order to achieve success”. This from a nation whose proud sporting traditions have been based on “’Ave a go, yer mug!”

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

Super Rugby Weekend of 2nd-3rd March.

Super Rugby Weekend of 2nd-3rd March.

By Bob Dwyer.

Sunday, 4th March.

       I intend to write this weekend on the France v Ireland match, which will be played tonight in Paris, but, in the meantime, just a short note on the weekend’s Super Rugby.

Ireland Take A Point, But Rue What Might Have Been.

Ireland Take A Point, But Rue What Might Have Been.

By Bob Dwyer.
 
5th March, 2012.
 
Ireland scored two tries to France’s one at Stad de France – a big effort this. They led by 17 points to 6 at the
half-time break – another big effort. But by the end, France had drawn level with no second half points for Ireland
– a big disappointment this.

France had looked disjointed in the first half. Ireland’s defence, so quick off the line, were clearly frustrating
them and we saw a couple of trademark “held up in the tackle” decisions for turnovers to Ireland. One wondered,
in fact, whether this was going to be one of those “French” days, like the one they suffered at home against the
Wallabies a couple of years back, but this team, led by the impressive Thierry Dusatoir, turned things completely
around after the break. On the back of a dominant set scrum and two stolen lineouts, they kept Ireland scoreless
for the entire second stanza, despite Ireland having clear opportunities. Perhaps the rain, as it set in, made things
too difficult for teams who can both play an expansive game. Gordon D’Arcy, for example, saw the ball simply slip
from his grasp as he shaped to pass in one late Ireland attack on the French line.

It was an exciting game, played with huge intensity of defence and at the tackle contest, but I remain puzzled at
the inability of both sides to finish opportunities with any score at all, in true “northern Hemisphere style”. It has
long been the mark of these teams that they clearly see an opportunity and take it by the scruff of the neck. No
flippant squandering here. Yet Ireland had three lengthy second half visits to the French quarter and never really
got close to any points. France had two late shots at drop-goal for one grubber and one charge down – surely
Lionel Beauxis could have found a more secure spot in behind his pack. There was a lack of composure allround,
from both teams.

Ireland, for the last few years, have looked threatening in attack, WHEN their fly-half – generally Jonny Sexton
– plays close to the line. They fell away completely in the RWC when Ronan O’Gara, inexplicably preferred to
Sexton, got deeper and deeper under pressure from Welsh defence and the same occurred on Saturday night.
This time Sexton was in the pivot role, but most wider attacks were “second-line plays”. I don’t like them, even –
which is rare – they are played well. They are, like cut-out passes, an excuse for poor catch-&-pass skills, and the
resulting key attack is way too deep to pose any real threat to the defensive line. Add some cross-field running,
seemingly an essential component of second-line plays, and most plays end up in the 5 metre channel, with some
in touch. Poor play! Perhaps they have already forgotten the lessons so well delivered by Alan Gaffney. France
suffered similarly, but they at least have an understanding of eventually straightening the line, even if much too
late for my likening.

Still, the capacity crowd enjoyed it and their full two minute rendition of La Marseillaise in the closing minutes
showed the support and hopes for a victory for their team. It was not to be.

I have been highly impressed in recent months in the quality of rugby played in the northern hemisphere and
in recent weeks in the Six Nations Championship. Wales and France have looked very good; Ireland similarly in
patches; England are definitely heading in the right direction; and Scotland and even Italy have some quality
about them. With all of this in mind, I was eagerly awaiting this deferred match.

There were plenty of truly greaty players on display and most had their moments. Rob Kearney was majestic in
the air and across the ground and has recaptured his Lions form of a couple of years back. Rory Best is at the top
of his game, but his scrum ran a clear second.

Imanol Harinordoquy was his usual quality, Maestri looks a real player for the future, Dusautoir carried and
tackled impressively.

But I expected much more and I was disappointed.

www.bobdwyerrugby.com

THE DEFINITIVE RUGBY COACHING NETWORK.

Page 1 of 14

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Previous 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »

Bob's Blog Archives

Powered by mod LCA